![]() ![]() In other words if you have a compressor or limiter on a bus, or maybe noise reduction sensitive to input level, all that stuff then reacts differently after you've mixed your content because you changed the input into those plugins. PS (added): One reason for not doing it the way you are is that if you have any dynamic processing AFTER the clip-level you now change how it behaves. And I mean this regardless of whether or not clip normalization worked the way I think you want it to work. Don't go back and tweak clips this way to satisfy specs. Personally I think the way to go about this is to mix to target as you're working. That would give a result that might seem counterintuitive. Instead of measuring peak in step one, just use loudness. I could be wrong of course, but it actually seems like a quite likely way they could have coded this. That would mean that the summed value you see at the output would be higher by definition. If the process that the software uses is simply replacing "highest peak level" with "highest loudness", then I wouldn't be surprised if it simply took the loudest individual clip it could measure and offset it to hit your target, then offset all other clips by the same amount. I suppose that the other, simple, way to look at this is that the only difference between normalize and amplify is that all that normalize has done is to work out what number youre shooting for - so its an additional scanning and calculating process, yes - but the final operation is identical. With one another, and you want to normalize all of them together." You have a series of clips, such as a dialog recording, where the levels are consistent So that the highest peak level of all selected clips is used to define the adjustment,Īnd the volume of all selected clips is adjusted by the same amount. "When Set Level is set to Relative, all selected clips are treated as if they’re one clip, The dB correction is then applied to all selected clips Or in other words it is similar to an automated version of Reynaud Venter proposed workflow. ![]() ![]() Philipp Glaninger wrote:for me that sounds like a temporary bounce file is created that gets the Normalization treatment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |